| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:10:04 +0100 From: "Oleg Verych" <olecom@...il.com> To: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: "Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>, "Steve Brokenshire" <sbrokenshire@...tia.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org Subject: why filename extensions? (Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation.) On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote: > depmod/modinfo/insmod/modprobe know only if you compile > module-init-tools with zlib support. > > And what about the busybox versions? > > A different name would e.g.: > - easily allow proper error handling if the userspace modules program > doesn't support the compression used > - better scale to support additional compressions > - give the user a hint what is happening and what might be the problem > when anythig goes wrong Right... http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general/8495 _______ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists