linux-kernel - Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:45:51 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream  :-))

Hi Russell,

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:54:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:09:43 +0000 Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > As mentioned elsewhere, what we need for ARM is to extend the kautobuild
> > infrastructure (see armlinux.simtec.co.uk) so that we can have more trees
> > at least compile tested regularly - but that requires the folk there to
> > have additional compute power (which isn't going to happen unless folk
> > stamp up some machines _or_ funding).
> 
> I now have an arm cross compiler (gcc-4.0.2-glibc-2.3.6
> arm-unknown-linux-gnu).  (See the results page at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ - I must get a better
> name/place :-(.)  Is this sufficient to help you out?  What configs would
> be useful to build (as Andrew said, they don't take very long each).
> 
> I really want as many subsystems as possible in the linux-next tree in an
> attempt to avoid some of the merge/conflict problems we have had in the
> past.  What can we do to help?

OK, I tried this out:  I built all 75 arm defconfigs with the cross
compiler above (the resulting log file is at
http://ozlabs.org/~sfr/armall.log.bz2). 17 failed (I don't know why - I
didn't even really look).  If this is useful, I can get this added to our
infrastructure so that every linux-next kernel (and others as well, maybe)
will be built for all these.

Would that help, Russell?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

P.S. From the timestamps in the log file you can see that this would take
around an hour each time.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped