[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:17:28 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
To: htejun@...il.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:21:13 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> I can't see what changing the meaning of rq->data_len (and
> >>> investigating all the block drivers) gives us.
> >> No matter which way you go, you change the meaning of rq->data_len and
> >> you MUST inspect rq->data_len usage whichever way you go.
> >
> > The patch doens't change that rq->data_len means the true data
> > length. But yeah, it breaks rq->data_len == sum(sg). So it might break
> > some drivers.
>
> Yeah, that's what I was saying. You end up breaking one of the two
> assumptions. As sglist is getting modified for any driver if it has DMA
> alignment set, whether rq->data_len is adjusted together or not, sglist
> and data_len usages have to be audited.
My patch (well, James' original approach) doesn't affect drivers that
don't use drain buffer. rq->data_len still means the true data length
and rq->data_len is equal to sum(sg) for them. So right now we need to
audit only libata.
But your patch changes the meaning of rq->data_len. It affects all the
drivers. So it breaks non libata stuff, like the SMP handler. We need
to audit all the drivers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists