[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:41:56 -0700
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...e.hu>, <bill.huey@...il.com>,
<kevin@...man.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <cminyard@...sta.com>,
<dsingleton@...sta.com>, <dwalker@...sta.com>,
"Moiz Kohari" <MKohari@...ell.com>,
"Peter Morreale" <PMorreale@...ell.com>,
"Sven Dietrich" <SDietrich@...ell.com>, <dsaxena@...xity.net>,
<acme@...hat.com>, <ak@...e.de>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<npiggin@...e.de>, <pavel@....cz>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 4/9] optimize rt lock wakeup
>>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:37 AM, in message
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0803031036380.18766@...dalf.stny.rr.com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> It is redundant to wake the grantee task if it is already running
>
> This is only expensive for your adaptive mutex algorithm, not what is in
> there today. It belongs _after_ the adaptive mutex patch in the series.
>
> -- Steve
Fair enough.
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists