[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:10:35 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "Klaus S. Madsen" <ksm@...rnemadsen.org>,
Suspend-devel list <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending
Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>> The only thing I don't understand is why this is suddenly a problem with
>> 2.6.25, and not with 2.6.24? Is there a bug in 2.6.24 and previously
>> that allows real-mode execution of non-executable pages?
>
> It is strange indeed... Should it be traced as an regression?
> Pavel
I'd like to understand what the heck happened, but as far as we can
observe right now, it's a *progression*, not a regression, since
executing out of a non-PROT_EXEC area isn't *supposed* to work...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists