lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:12:50 +1100 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] add ALL_CPUS option to stop_machine_run() On Saturday 01 March 2008 06:15:59 Ingo Molnar wrote: > Right now the answer is: "if you want to do hard RT then avoid doing > things like loading modules". (which you should avoid while doing > hard-RT anyway) Hi Ingo, I agree, but Max is doing a service by making more people aware of the limitations of stop_machine so they don't sprinkle it around like candy :) I think the module load case can be reasonably fixed; it's in my backlog now. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists