[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:23:51 +0900
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Xpl++ <xpl@...n.net>
CC: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Prefixing cgroup generic control filenames with "cgroup."
Xpl++ wrote:
> Paul Menage ??????:
>> ...
>>
>> A compromise might be to keep "tasks" unprefixed, and say that future
>> names get the "cgroup." prefix; in this case I'd be inclined to add
>> the prefix to notify_on_release and release_agent on the grounds that
>> there's much less chance of breaking anyone with those files since (I
>> suspect) they're much less used.
>>
> This makes most sense to me. It won't break any existing software
> (most likely) while it seems reasonable to leave 'tasks' unprefixed as
> this is something that any software using any subsystem of cgroup
> would be using anyway and it is not that much associated with a
> particulat subsystem.
>
And it makes most sense to me too, though I still doubt name collision
will be a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists