linux-kernel - Re: Patch: romfs_lookup always failed in linux-2.6.25-rc3-git3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:26:21 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch: romfs_lookup always failed in linux-2.6.25-rc3-git3

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:36:20 -0800 "Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> 	romfs_lookup worked in 2.6.24.2, but always fails in
> linux-2.6.25-rc3-git3.  fs/romfs/inode.c is the same in at least
> 2.6.25-rc3 through 2.6.25-rc3-git4 and the latest sources from git, so
> these versions almost certainly have the same problem.
> 
> 	The bug appears to be from a well meaning but botched attempt
> to eliminate a goto from romfs_lookup.  Previously, a goto statement
> was used to skip over "inode = NULL;" when the lookup succeeded.  In
> the 2.6.25-rc3 version, inode is set to NULL even when an inode was
> found, so the result is the the lookup always appears to fail.
> 
> 	 The attached patch fixes the problem while still eliminating
> the goto.  The patch adds one line and replaces one line.  It only
> looks big because I've set the number of context lines to 10 for
> better readability.  I have tested it in on a romfs initial ramdisk
> which on which I had experienced the problem.
> 
> 	If this patch looks OK to you, can you please submit it
> upstream?

Thanks.

> P.S. romfs_lookup casts a valid pointer to an int and then back again
> with res = PTR_ERR(inode);...return ERR_PTR(res).  This may break on
> arhictectures where sizeof(int) < sizeof(pointer).  If I want to submit
> a subsequent fix for this, are you the person I should the patch to?

I can take care of it.

Please remember the signed-off-by: red tape.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/