linux-kernel - Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:42:20 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 12/21] No Reclaim LRU Infrastructure

> > > +config NORECLAIM
> > > +	bool "Track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)"
> > > +	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT
> > 
> > as far as I remembered, somebody said CONFIG_NORECLAIM is easy confusable.
> > may be..
> > 
> > IMHO insert "lru" word is better.
> > example,
> > 
> > config NORECLAIM_LRU
> > 	bool "Zone LRU of track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)"
> > 	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && 64BIT
> 
> OK.  But, I'd suggest the 'bool' description be something like:
> 
> config NORECLAIM_LRU
> 	bool "Add LRU list to track non-reclaimable pages (EXPERIMENTAL; 64BIT only)"

That's nice. thanks.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/