linux-kernel - Re: PM/FB/gxfb: add config option that allows disabling of VT switch during suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:06:12 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@....com>
Cc:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, adaplas@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, info-linux@...de.amd.com,
	rjw@...k.pl, samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org
Subject: Re: PM/FB/gxfb: add config option that allows disabling of VT
	switch during suspend

Hi!

> > > > If so, that means extra #ifdef's sprinkled throughout the code.  Note
> > > > that most framebuffer drivers won't be supporting this, and those that
> > > > do will almost certainly always want vt switching turned off..
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't think you need any ifdefs or config options at all, do you?  Just
> > > add a new module parameter to this driver and some little interface into
> > > the PM core which allows the driver to set no_vt_switch?
> > > 
> > 
> > That's a possibility, but doesn't adding hooks into PM core for two
> > drivers (lxfb and gxfb) seems like overkill?  I also don't really see
> > anyone needing to switch back and forth between VT_SWITCH and
> > NO_VT_SWITCH other than to work around possible bugs in the register
> > save/restore code..
> 
> I like Andrew's idea.  I wager This won't be Geode specific for long.
> Either other drivers will get the hint and add real save/restore code
> or the GPU subystem code being worked on by the X folks will come along
> and make the VT switch obsolete for everybody.  Either way, I see hooks
> in the PM core as generic love that everybody can benefit from.

Exactly. We'd like _all_ drivers to behave like this.
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/