linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:35:17 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v5


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> > -	extern void __bad_fxsave_alignment(void);
> > -
> > -	if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15)
> > -		__bad_fxsave_alignment();
> 
> I think removal of such checks needs giving necessary alignment to 
> cache. Previously it worked because of __aligned((16)) and 
> L1_CACHE_SHIFT combo.

it's still checked, just elsewhere:

> +       WARN_ON((unsigned long)dst->thread.xstate & 15);

i'd not expect us to ever align worse than 16 bytes in the future so 
this is a non-issue i think.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/