linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] signals: fold complete_signal() into send_signal/do_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:56:29 +0300
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] signals: fold complete_signal() into send_signal/do_send_sigqueue

On 03/10, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> This and 1-3/6 look OK to me.  But, since this one appears to be changing
> the sense of the return value from send_signal, I think you should at least
> take the opportunity to add a comment to send_signal saying clearly what
> its return conventions are.

Actually, this patch restores the meaning of the return value, it was temporary
changed by the previous cleanups in -mm tree.

With this patch send_signal() return either 0 or error, as it historically was.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/