lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:41:00 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>, lizf@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp, linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move memory controller allocations to their own slabs On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:01:49 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Move the memory controller data structures page_cgroup and > mem_cgroup_per_zone to their own slab caches. It saves space on the system, > allocations are not necessarily pushed to order of 2 and should provide > performance benefits. eh? Those structures are tiny. Which slab allocator has gone and used an order-2 allocation and for which structure did it (stupidly) do this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists