linux-kernel - Re: boot cgroup questions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:30:59 -0500
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Cc:	menage@...gle.com, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: boot cgroup questions

Max K wrote:
> btw I still do not see the "incompatibility" argument.

It's similar, perhaps, to what happens when we try to accomodate two
architectures in one file system, with things like:
	/x86_64/bin
	/ia64/bin
replacing the well known /bin.

Things break.  Apps such as the major batch schedulers (PBS and LSF)
and various other tools and scripts buried here and there have come
used to developing particular cpuset hierarchies over the last couple
of years.

Any time you force another dimension into such an existing hierarchy,
things break, and people get annoyed.

Sure ... the kernel doesn't care ... it can handle whatever hierarchy
you like.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/