linux-kernel - Re: whose job is it to include various header files?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	mws@...sted-brains.org
cc:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: whose job is it to include various header files?

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, mws@...sted-brains.org wrote:

> what i said in my first sentence is the imho proper way: if you
> alter sources and includes get obsolete, remove them and fix
> compiling again for files that formerly depended (implicit or
> explicit) on this altered sources. not to much work for the
> developer himself and also not exhausting the compile times.

and, in my defense, that's what i *thought* i was doing, not having
noticed that one of those "unnecessary" #includes really was
required after all.  argh.  that was embarrassing.

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/