| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:08:18 +0100 From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@...clausthal.de> To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24.X: SATA/AHCI related boot delay. - not with 2.6.24.3 On Mittwoch, 19. März 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: > x UDMA/133 abar m8192@...9dfc000 port 0xf9dfc200 > > > irq 315 > > [ 38.125479] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@...9dfc000 port > > 0xf9dfc280 irq 315 > > [ 38.597035] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > > [ 38.597732] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1600JS-00MHB1, 10.02E01, max > > UDMA/133 [ 38.597775] ata1.00: 312581808 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 > > [ 38.598405] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > [ 39.069342] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > > [ 39.084225] ata2.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-12, max UDMA7 > > [ 39.084264] ata2.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth > > 0/32) [ 39.086268] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > So, just to confirm. With the updated patch, you don't see any problem, > right? Correct. With the updated patch I don't see problems in 'non-raid' mode. AHCI mode still has problems without nosmi. But that is an entirely different problem, right? Glück Auf, Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists