lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:55:39 +0000
From:	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@...il.com>
To:	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc:	"Rene Herman" <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
	"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	git <git@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Josef Sipek" <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2

On 24/03/2008, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com> wrote:
> Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl> writes:
>  > And I remember some mumblings about git growing quilt-like
>  > functionality itself. Anything on that?
>
>
> Not my mumbling, but I am quite open to slurp in guilt as a subdirectory
>  in git.git at some point in the future just like we bundle git-gui and
>  gitk if asked by the maintainer.
>
>  The same applies to StGIT for that matter, although I somehow feel that is
>  much less likely to happen, because it lived long enough as a standalone
>  project with enough following to achieve sustainable momentum by itself.

Indeed, StGIT has grown quite a lot (it now has ~45 commands) and it
probably feels better as a tool on its own. However, I think it would
be good for git to get such functionality (and it could even share
some ideas StGIT and guilt). If this functionality will get fully
integrated in git, StGIT could use it directly rather than the
low-level git commands.

An example of additional functionality that might stay outside of git
(at least for a while): since basic patch management support is pretty
much complete in StGIT, a feature we are thinking about adding is
better support for patch sharing between developers (or
repositories/branches). This should allow easier cloning and merging
with branches that have a volatile history at the top.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ