linux-kernel - Re: larger default page sizes...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:57:47 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: larger default page sizes...

J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> 
> But there is a general problem of larger pages in systems that
> don't support them natively (in hardware) depending in how it's
> implemented the memory manager in the kernel:
> 
>    "Doubling the soft page size implies
>       halfing the TLB soft-entries in the old hardware".
> 
>    "x4 soft page size=> 1/4 TLB soft-entries, ... and so on."
> 
> Assuming one soft double-sized page represents 2 real-sized pages,
> one replacing of one soft double-sized page implies replacing
> 2 TLB's entries containing the 2 real-sized pages.
> 
> The TLB is very small, its entries are around 24 entries aprox. in
> some processors!.
> 

That's not a problem, actually, since the TLB entries can get shuffled 
like any other (for software TLBs it's a little different, but it can be 
dealt with there too.)

The *real* problem is ABI breakage.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/