linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:25:48 -0500
From:	Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>
To:	jes@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v3

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> This set of five patches moves XPC and XPNET to drivers/misc/xp in preparation
> for enabling X86_64 support.
> 
> I discovered that the previous versions of this patch were missing the
> replacement of kernel_thread() by kthread_run() and the elimination of
> daemonize().

It looks like patches 3 and 4 of this patchset are too large to be
accepted by the linux-ia64 mailing list (whereas they both do appear
on the linux-kernel mailing list).

  -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 204460 2008-03-26 16:36 generic-xp	<<< [Patch 3/5]
  -rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 163339 2008-03-26 16:36 Lindent		<<< [Patch 4/5]

So what do I do about them? I'm assuming I need to re-submit the patchset
with these two large patches broken up into multiple smaller patches?
What's the max patch size accepted by linux_ia64 mailing list?

Thanks,
Dean

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/