lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:46:48 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	ying.huang@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/4] x86_64 boot: Add linked listof struct
	setup_data to boot protocol


* Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:

> Ingo wrote:
> > stupidly shortsighted limit ...
> 
> Eh ... I don't think all that shortsighted ... that 4096 limit has 
> probably been around longer than Linux.  Linus or hpa or others would 
> know the history better than I do.

the limit for boot parameters is 2048 bytes - the BUILD_WARN_ON() checks 
for the sum of the two boot parameter areas. We used empty_zero_page for 
boot parameter passing for a near eternity - 2K for the command line 
(which used to be clipped - recently upped to true 2048), and 2K for the 
boot parameters.

As a historic/nostalgic sidenote: the 2048 limit is not as old as Linux, 
version 0.11 of Linux had 512 bytes of special area for boot parameters, 
at 0x90000-0x901FF.

having fixed-length 2K buffering ABI between two historically rather 
inflexible pieces of software (the bootloader and the kernel), at a very 
fragile and under-capable junction of our bootstrap (very early during 
bootup) _is_ shortsighted. Granted, it's a difficult area to change but 
still it's a nasty limit - as you have found it out first-hand ;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ