linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] hotplug-memory: adding non-section-aligned memory is bad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:20:18 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] hotplug-memory: adding non-section-aligned memory
 is bad

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:51:26 -0700
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>   
>>> (I wrote online_page() in above, but online_pages() is maybe better.
>>>  It does all what you want.)
>>>   
>>>       
>> No, for my use-case the pages must be onlined one by one as they get 
>> some physical memory assigned to them.  At the time I do add_memory(), 
>> I'm just allocating page structures, but there's no memory backing that 
>> range.
>>
>>     
> yes, I see.
>
>   
>> That's why I need to disable the sysfs onlining interface, because it 
>> bulk onlines the pages before there's anything behind them.
>>
>>     
>
> My point is. online_pages() does following things.
>
> - call notifier
> - update information , total_pages etc...
> - re-configure zonelist if necessary...
>
> But online_page() not. Hmm...
>
> How about capturing online_page() by balloon ?
>   

You're saying that using online_page() on each page on its own is not 
sufficient?

> ex.)
> ==
> call add_memory() to create mem_map
> call online_pages() against the whole section. <=== call this without sysfs.
>      online_pages() do misc. jobs
>         call online_page() one by one (arch dependent) called by walk_memory_resource.
>             online_page() will finally call free_page(page).
>             <=========== Xen capture here.
>             Don't free onlined page and swallow them into baloon driver.
> ==
>   

I'm not sure what you mean by "capture" here.  Do you mean a hook?  I'd 
rather not have to put some Xen-specific hook in here.

What would happen if I did online_pages(pfn, 1) on each page as I 
populate it?

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/