linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] forgotten bits of Sangoma drivers removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rpjday@...shcourse.ca
Cc:	bunk@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] forgotten bits of Sangoma drivers removal

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:14:46 -0400 (EDT)

> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, David Miller wrote:
> 
> > From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 01:49:01 +0300
> >
> > > Robert P. J. Day spotted that my removal of the Sangoma drivers missed a
> > > few bits.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> >
> > I must have missed some context or another patch, but
> > linux/if_wanpipe.h is still there, so I can't see why
> > we can remove it from linux/Kbuild
> 
> AFAICT, nothing in the source tree includes that header file, so i'm
> guessing that the patch should also include simply deleting it if it
> has no further value.

Ok, that makes sense.

Adrian, if you agree, please respin your patch with that
modification.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/