linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CLOCK_MONOTONIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:01:51 -0700
From:	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW


On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:50 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, john stultz wrote:
> 
> > My solution is to introduce CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW. This exposes a
> > nanosecond based time value, that increments starting at bootup and has
> > no frequency adjustments made to it what so ever.
> > 
> > The time is accessed from userspace via the posix_clock_gettime()
> > syscall, passing CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW as the clock_id.
> 
> This is a reworked version of this patch based on the previous 
> clocksource_forward_now patch, since clocksource_forward_now() takes 
> care of the time offset now, it's not needed to do this at various places.
> I also got rid of the monotonic_raw splitting, so the work done during 
> update_wall_time() is quite a bit simpler.
> 
> bye, Roman
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/clocksource.h |    5 ++++
>  include/linux/time.h        |    2 +
>  kernel/posix-timers.c       |   15 ++++++++++++++
>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/clocksource.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/clocksource.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/clocksource.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct clocksource {
>  	/* timekeeping specific data, ignore */
>  	cycle_t cycle_interval;
>  	u64	xtime_interval;
> +	u64	raw_interval;
>  	/*
>  	 * Second part is written at each timer interrupt
>  	 * Keep it in a different cache line to dirty no
> @@ -87,6 +88,8 @@ struct clocksource {
>  	cycle_t cycle_last ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>  	u64 xtime_nsec;
>  	s64 error;
> +	u64 raw_nsec;
> +	long raw_sec;


So, with the raw_sec being stored in the clocksource, and there not
being a monotonic_raw value, doesn't this mean the MONOTONIC_RAW value
will clear to zero on clocksource changes? 


>  #ifdef CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_WATCHDOG
>  	/* Watchdog related data, used by the framework */
> @@ -215,6 +218,8 @@ static inline void clocksource_calculate
> 
>  	/* Go back from cycles -> shifted ns, this time use ntp adjused mult */
>  	c->xtime_interval = (u64)c->cycle_interval * c->mult;
> +	c->raw_interval = ((u64)c->cycle_interval * c->mult_orig) <<
> +			  (NTP_SCALE_SHIFT - c->shift);
>  }

Could you explain further how this extra shift scaling is beneficial?
(Additionally, if we're using it for more then just NTP's shift, we
might want to change its name).

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/