linux-kernel - Re: [-mm] Make the memory controller more desktop responsive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:14:32 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, taka@...inux.co.jp,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Make the memory controller more desktop responsive

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:02:53 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> This patch makes the memory controller more responsive on my desktop.
>>
>> Here is what the patch does
>>
>> 1. Reduces the number of retries to 2. We had 5 earlier, since we
>>    were controlling swap cache as well. We pushed data from mappings
>>    to swap cache and we needed additional passes to clear out the cache.
> 
> Hmm, what this change improves ?
> I don't want to see OOM.
> 

I had set it to 5 earlier, since the swap cache came back to our memory
controller, where it was accounted. I have not seen OOM with it on my desktop,
but at some point if the memory required is so much that we cannot fulfill it,
we do OOM. I have not seen any OOM so far with these changes.

>> 2. It sets all cached pages as inactive. We were by default marking
>>    all pages as active, thus forcing us to go through two passes for
>>    reclaiming pages
> Agreed.
> 
>> 3. Removes congestion_wait(), since we already have that logic in
>>    do_try_to_free_pages()
>>
> Agreed.


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/