linux-kernel - Re: [patch 02/10] emm: notifier logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 02:57:59 +0200
From:	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	general@...ts.openfabrics.org, steiner@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] emm: notifier logic

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 03:30:50PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> +	mm_lock(mm);
> +	e->next = mm->emm_notifier;
> +	/*
> +	 * The update to emm_notifier (e->next) must be visible
> +	 * before the pointer becomes visible.
> +	 * rcu_assign_pointer() does exactly what we need.
> +	 */
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(mm->emm_notifier, e);
> +	mm_unlock(mm);

My mm_lock solution makes all rcu serialization an unnecessary
overhead so you should remove it like I already did in #v11. If it
wasn't the case, then mm_lock wouldn't be a definitive fix for the
race.

> +		e = rcu_dereference(e->next);

Same here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/