linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] atmel serial reduce trasmitting window & code style patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:57:00 -0400
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@...oo.it>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel serial reduce trasmitting window & code style
 patch

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:39:06 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@...oo.it> wrote:

> Reduce the trasmitting window size to avoid blocking of tasklet because 
> it must handle the receive phase too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: michael <trimarchi@...dalf.sssup.it>

Ok, the patch seems to make sense, but your description isn't very good...
  * What problem does this patch solve (I think I know it, but I don't
    want to guess.)
  * This patch doesn't really reduce any "TX window" since the window
    simply didn't exist before (or was infinitely long or whatever.) I
    think you should mention that this limitation is a new thing.
  * Why is 32 a good value?

Also, do we need to reschedule the tasklet if we terminate the loop
because of this limit? I think we can get away with not doing it since
the interrupt handler will be triggered as soon as we enable the TX
interrupt. But perhaps we should avoid enabling the interrupt and
schedule the tasklet since we _know_ there's a TX interrupt pending?

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/