linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:49 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9

Hi Stefan,

On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:55:42 +0200 Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > There were a few merge conflicts (fairly trivial) and couple of build
> > failures (notified).  There is a know build failure with powerpc
> > allyesconfig.  Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
> ...
> > Merging ieee1394/for-next
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in lib/Kconfig.debug
> 
> Would it be safe for me (and preferred by you) to merge sched/for-akpm
> into ieee1394/for-next to resolve this conflict until next mainline merge?

Actually, no, as sched/for-akpm gets rebased sometimes.  I only have to
fix these trivial conflicts once as "git rerere" remembers the fix for me
and they are so trivial that Linus will probably fix them the same way
when he finally merges your tree.  Also, there is the possibility that he
will merge your tree before sched/for-akpm ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped