linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] rfkill: clarify meaning of rfkill states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:22:34 -0400
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] rfkill: clarify meaning of rfkill states

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:37:17PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> rfkill really should have been named rfswitch.  As it is, one can get
> confused whether RFKILL_STATE_ON means the KILL switch is on (and
> therefore, the radio is being *blocked* from operating), or whether it
> means the RADIO rf output is on.
> 
> Clearly state that RFKILL_STATE_ON means the radio is *unblocked* from
> operating (i.e. there is no rf killing going on).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
> Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>
> Cc: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>

I consider Ivo maintaining rfkill but for what it worth:

Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/