linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing clocks.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:21:32 -0400
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, tony@...mide.com, paul@...an.com,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing
 clocks.

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:13:30 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Anyway, this patchset is basically an arm-only thing, so I'll need
> guidance, please...

As soon as any drivers starts using the dynamic clock registration API
introduced by these patches, other architectures will be sort of forced
to care about it...

I consider switching to clklib on avr32 regardless of this...though I
haven't really started that work yet.

But if Russell want to merge this initial dump through the ARM tree, I'm
perfectly fine with that, even if this library is intended to be
architecture-neutral.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/