| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:51:27 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@...b.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: StackProtector Oopses - Re: 2.6.25-mm1 On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:36:45 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > * Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@...b.net> wrote: > > > is enough to prevent my system booting, viz: > > hm, does it boot up fine with the attached patch and stackprotector > enabled? It appears that your system got to the self-test so > stackprotector is working mostly - it's just that the self-test went > wrong. > yes it'll be interesting to see if this is due to the test triggering or due to something else. Reuben: I assume your gcc is pretty vanilla and doesn't have weird patches in this area? Can you do a (with the test enabled in the config/code) do a make kernel/panic.s and send me that file? (this allows me to see what code your gcc generated for the test) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists