linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:55:53 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, jmorris@...ei.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

On Thursday 17 April 2008 8:04:07 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:46 -0400
>
> Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com> wrote:
> > For what it's worth I just looked over the changes in netnode.c and
> > nothing is jumping out at me.  The changes ran fine for me when
> > tested on the later 2.6.25-rcX kernels but I suppose that doesn't
> > mean a whole lot.
>
> Perhaps it was tested only against slub?  That config uses slab.

Yes, I believe it was testing it with slub.

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/