linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] OLPC: Add support for calling into Open Firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:15:40 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Mitch Bradley" <wmb@...mworks.com>
Cc:	"Andres Salomon" <dilinger@...ued.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Joseph Fannin" <jfannin@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jordan.crouse@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OLPC: Add support for calling into Open Firmware

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Mitch Bradley <wmb@...mworks.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>  Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> >
> > how about changing to ofw_32.c?
> >
> > YH
> >
> >
>
>  Is your suggestion to change the filename from "ofw.c" to "ofw_32.c"?  That
> seems like a good idea to me.

Yes.

BTW,  why olpc need OFW runtime service?
why not just put the info in in ram with some signiture, so
kernel/util just need to loot at the table if needed?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/