linux-kernel - Re: Serious performance regression in Wine applications and Linux 2.6.24.*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:53:42 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Kai <epimetreus@...tmail.fm>
Cc:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: Serious performance regression in Wine applications and Linux
	2.6.24.*


* Kai <epimetreus@...tmail.fm> wrote:

> I did, however, test it on 2.6.25-rc8, and attached is the output of 
> cfs-debug-info.sh

your vmstat:

-- vmstat: 
--procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
 3  0      0 870540    340 746184    0    0   952   137  198 4752 21 12 60  7
 1  0      0 870952    340 746320    0    0   128     0  356 17723 28 23 50  0
 1  0      0 872224    340 746320    0    0     0    21  394 18066 30 20 50  0
 1  0      0 872244    340 746320    0    0     0     0  353 17987 29 22 50  0
 1  0      0 871416    340 746320    0    0     0     0  392 17971 28 22 50  0

suggests that there's a constant 50% idle time. Probably one core 
running X and the client, the other core staying idle?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/