lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:12:14 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Calling free_pages on part of the memory returned by get_free_pages?

According to LDD3, if I call get_free_pages() to allocate X bytes, I have to
free all of those pages with free_pages().  The VM internals are a little bit
over my head, but I looked at the code and I didn't see why that is a requirement.

For example, let's say I want to allocated 6MB of physically-contiguous memory.
 If I call x = get_free_pages(11) to get 8MB.  What happens if I then do
"free_pages(x + 6 * 1024 * 1024, 9)"?

I remember doing this on the 2.4 kernel, and it never gave me any problems.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ