linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:11:27 +0200
From:	"Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
To:	"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff

2008/4/22, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>:
> On 04/22/2008 12:54 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:26:04AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Having slub_debug enabled, tomorrow will be results, I guess...
> > > >
> > > Sorry, one more entry:
> > >
> > > 00000000000000f0 dentry.d_op (Zdenek, offset ? around 136)
> > >
> >
>
>  Zdenek's is at offset 184.
>
>
> >
> > > 00f0000000000000 dentry.d_hash.next (me, offset 24)
> > > ffff81f02003f16c dentry.d_name.name (me, offset 56)
> > >        memory ORed by 000000f000000000
> > > fffff0002004c1b0 file.f_mapping (me, offset 176)
> > >        memory hole, it was something like
> > >        (ffff81002004c1b0 & ~00000f0000000000) | 0000f00000000000?
> > > ffffffffffffffff dentry.d_hash.next (Rafael, offset ? around 24)
> > >        -1, ~0ULL
> > >
> >
> > Are these running with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU?  Grasping at straws, but
> > there are a couple of patches that need to move from -rt to mainline,
> > but mostly related to SELinux.  So if both PREEMPT_RCU and SELinux
> > were in use, we might be missing "rcu-various-fixups.patch" from:
> >
>
>  $ grep RCU .config
>  CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y
>  # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
>  $ grep SECU .config
>  # CONFIG_EXT4DEV_FS_SECURITY is not set
>  # CONFIG_SECURITY is not set
>  # CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES is not set
>
>  I guess not.
>
>  BTW the corruption I mentioned earlier was char 'ð' and it's ('p' | 0xf0)
> in latin2. I think it was set_ðending_irq IIRC. Whatever, it won't help us.
>

I've kernel compiled with preemptible RCU & Security - but usually
using selinux=off as a kernel parameter

Zdenek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/