| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:42:05 +0100 From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: sys_indirect or many syscalls? On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:27:46PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I still think the sys_indirect method is the best since it avoids bloat > in the number of system calls. The same could be (and had been) said about ioctl(2)... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists