linux-kernel - Re: [GIT]: Sparc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Sparc

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:10:00 -0700 (PDT)

> Hmm. I think this is sad. The fact is, Solaris/SunOS is the de-facto 
> standard for Sparc. Which makes me think that not emulating them is a real 
> capability loss. 

There is no capability loss, the code we have hasn't worked on
anything other than extremely trivial Solaris cases, and that's
when it was working.

Nobody has tested or tried to use it at all for years, and as a result
even something as simple as a modern compiled Solaris binary doing:

	int main(void) { return 0; }

won't even work because things the dynamic linker does are
unsupported.

It's not like I've removed the capability for people to run something
like Oracle/Solaris under Linux, nothing even half-way approaching
that ever worked, and so I just wanted to make that clear :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/