lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:16:53 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com> CC: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello, I wrote: > >>> I suppose. If we were needlessly pedantic, then perhaps >>> the libata-bmdma.c should be renamed to libata-sff.c, > > It *was* renamed to libata-sff.c, back in 2006. :-) > >>> and the libata-sff.c should be renamed libata-tf.c > > Not before splitting SFF-8038i stuff from it. > >>> But there's probably been a document or two since then, >>> where the SFF folks have documented the TF interfaces, too. > >> Don't know, at least I haven't encountered such spec. Unless you >> mean SFF-8020i (ATAPI CD-ROM spec). > > I've looked thru the list of their spec. and it didn't seem to have > any about taskfile specifically. SFF-8070 (ATAPI CD-RW) refers to > ATA/PI-4 for that matter. Aik... We can do s/sff/tf/ and leave bmdma alone to avoid even more confusion but sff has meant tf base interface for quite some time now in libata and I think it'll be better to remember that sff is the new tf. Sorry about the mess. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists