| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:28:17 +0200 From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) At Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:51:58 +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote: > > Hello. > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > No, I don't think input-pcspkr would be ever easily obsoleted by > > snd-pcsp. People definitely want a system without the sound subsystem > > but with a beep. > If you don't enable sound, then you > can't enable snd-pcsp, and so the > pcspkr can be enabled. Yeah, of course. Don't mix up with the argument about Kconfig dependency issues. I just reacted against your statement that input pcspkr driver will be obsoleted. > But if you have enabled the sound, > what's the use in not seeing the > snd-pcsp in the config? > Because most people already had > pcspkr enabled I guess, this just > reduces the availability of snd-pcsp > by an order of magnitude. And the > reason for that, is... ? I actually removed the dependency from snd-pcsp Kconfig again since this causes a dependency loop (at least, kbuild can't handle properly). But anyway, as mentioned in my previous post, snd-pcsp wouldn't be enabled on most of distros' kernels because it cannot be built together with input-pcspkr driver, unfortunately... Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists