linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:38:17 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] "big box" x86 changes, PCI


* Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:

> On Saturday, April 26, 2008 2:55 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ok, this is the final chunk of the "big box" topic - the PCI changes.
> >
> > These are the largest, and while i tried to reduce their number it's
> > still 19 commits - but it's all around the same topic. The bulk of the
> > new code is in a single file. The tree can be pulled from:
> >
> >   
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86-bigbox-pci.
> >git for-linus
> >
> > this depends on the bootmem changes which are now upstream. These
> > changes too have been in linux-next for some time and the cross-arch
> > (build) success rate is high, as in:
> >
> >    http://www.tglx.de/autoqa-cgi/index?run=89&tree=1
> >
> > all but the last few patches have been in x86.git for a longer time and
> > more than 95% of the changes are for arch/x86. (see the dates of the
> > patches. The "15 Feb 2008" ones are older than their timestamp - that's
> > when we imported those changes into a date-aware repository.)
> >
> > i booted up this tree 5 times on x86, mixed 64-bit/32-bit.
> 
> Only did a quick scan, but the changes look nice so far.  I'll take a 
> closer look and give it a try locally tomorrow.

ok, great! Let us know if you experience any problems - and please give 
us an Ack if it looks OK so that we can send the final pull request to 
Linus :-)

> On an unrelated note, can you take a look at the "PCI MSI breaks when 
> booting with nosmp" thread?  I posted a patch there that 
> unconditionally enables the local apic with nosmp/maxcpus=0 so that 
> MSI will work correctly.  The other option of course is to disable MSI 
> when nosmp/maxcpus=0 and local apic enable code alone.

yeah - great fix - your patch has been put into x86.git a few minutes 
after you posted the fix ;-) I think that's been a long-standing problem 
(== was broken forever), i noticed it happen on a number of Intel SDV 
boards myself in the past and initially suspected e1000 - it is the 
first driver that throws a fit with non-working MSI interrupts.

I never managed to track it down (there was nothing to bisect to and far 
enough in the past kernels simply stopped booting on that hardware) and 
things like acpi=off regularly dont work on prototype boards anyway. I'm 
glad you figured it out and it's on the way upstream.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/