linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Optimize lock in queue unplugging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:38:00 +0100
From:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	Mike Anderson <andmike@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize lock in queue unplugging

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:14:15AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> So it's basically dm calling into blk_unplug() all the time, which
> doesn't check if the queue is plugged. The reason why I didn't like the
> initial patch is that ->unplug_fn() really should not be called unless
> the queue IS plugged. So how about this instead:
> 
> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=c44993018887e82abd49023e92e8d8b6000e03ed
> 
> That's a lot more appropriate, imho.
 
Makes sense to me, ack.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/