linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:46:55 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] introduce simple_set_mnt_no_get() helper for
	NFS

On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 14:34 -0700, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> My only concern is the proliferation of 'simple_*' operations: in some
> cases in libfs.c we explicitly label those as being for in-memory/ramfs
> filesystems, whereas in other cases (such as this one) the name appears
> to be used for more generic functions.

I'm all to happy to give it a different name.  Any suggestions?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/