linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] misc: fix returning void-valued expression warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 May 2008 13:00:16 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] misc: fix returning void-valued expression
	warnings

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 02:43:50PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:

> I don't know who invented sparse, but I like this form of return.
> 1 - It saves me the curly brackets and extra return line. But mainly
> 2 - It is a programing statement that says: "Me here I'm an equivalent 
>   to that other call". So if in the future that inner function starts
>   to return, say, an error value, with the first style the compiler will
>   error. But with the second style the new error return will be silently
>   ignored. So these are not equivalent replacements. The former is a much
>   stronger bond between the caller and the callie.

3.  6.8.6.4(1): A return statement with an expression shall not appear in
a function whose return type is void.

Write in C, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/