linux-kernel - Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 May 2008 11:09:23 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tom Rini <trini@...nel.crashing.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, bunk@...nel.org,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, vegard.nossum@...il.com
Subject: Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> Honestly, I nearly died when I built all those cross-compilers.  Sooooooo
> many combinations of gcc/binutils/glibc refused to work for obscure
> reasons.  Compilation on x86_64 just didn't work at all and I ended up
> having to build everything on a slow i386 box, etc, etc.  The stream of
> email to Dan got increasingly strident ;)

This might be pointing out the obvious, but to just update the compiler
from 4.1.0 to 4.1.2 (or other) you don't need to recompile binutils and glibc.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/