lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 02 May 2008 11:15:33 -0600
From:	Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	jirislaby@...il.com, megaraidlinux@....com,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH #repost] SCSI: megaraid, fix suspend/resume sections

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 15:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[cut] 
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is only settable to 'n' if you're CONFIG_EMBEDDED which
> > has a zero set intersection with the users of megaraid, so in practical
> > terms, there's no actual box it could kill.
> 
> who suspends and resumes servers?

I read an article not long ago about a guy running an AMD renderfarm.
He was working on power management techniques, including suspending
systems that weren't in use.  It made a huge difference in power costs,
apparently.

I believe suspend is also used in some virtual server farms where
physical systems are resumed and virtuals are migrated to satisfy higher
CPU demands.

I could also see using it combined with a load balancer or proxy to
bring up backup web or database servers.

Compared to using networked/USB power bars or management controllers to
bring systems up and down, suspend/resume provides a faster response.
-- 
Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ