| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 13:06:37 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> Subject: Re: i387/FPU init issues... Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Sat, 3 May 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Intel explicitly documents "all processors with family 6 or F." > > It depends (as usually with Intel) on what document you are looking at. > Based on my short research, the instruction has been retroactively added > to the list of supported opcodes. Even my somewhat dated P4 manual does > not list it, never mind its predecessors. It could have been accidentally > omitted or even buggy in some early members of the P6 family and this > could have been the reason for not documenting it from the beginning (the > case of FFREEP comes to mind). > It has retroactively been added to the documented list for all P6 core chips - that should mean it works on all of them. The most common reason for not documenting something (other than various Pure Evil NDA schemes) is that it hasn't been properly verified. However, verification can be done a posteori. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists