lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 3 May 2008 15:52:52 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange linux-next build error

Just adding some cc's ... it is worth cc'ing linux-next for bugs in
linux-next (instead, or as well, as me personally) since people who are
interested are probably subscribed there.

On Sat, 3 May 2008 01:21:38 -0400 Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> wrote:
>
> After updating my local tree to the latest linux-next and starting a clean 
> build I see this error *ONLY* the first time I start a "make bzImage"
> 
>   CC      arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.o
>   LDS     arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.lds
> cc1: fatal error: opening output file 
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.lds: Permission denied
> compilation terminated.
> make[4]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.lds] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.bin] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/acpi] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel] Error 2
> make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
> 
> Restarting the build brings it through to completion. I've checked and there 
> is no reason that this error should occur.
> 
> madman@...ider:~/linux/linux-git/Documentation$ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)
> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> 
> (I'll be booting this kernel tomorrow to test it - previous -next kernels have 
> all faulted during boot)
> 
> DRH

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ