linux-kernel - Re: SCSI target subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 May 2008 11:41:41 +0200
From:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	"FUJITA Tomonori" <tomof@....org>
Cc:	"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>
Subject: Re: SCSI target subsystem

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net> wrote:
> I wrote all above to support my at first glance shocking conclusion that
> SCSI target subsystem is completely new subsystem of the kernel and it
> should live on its own with its own maintainer! This is the same as with the
> current interaction between SCSI and block subsystems in the kernel: SCSI
> uses block's functionality, but that doesn't mean that block and SCSI are
> the same subsystem.

Hello Tomo,

Due to the IET and STGT projects you have a lot of experience with
implementing SCSI target frameworks. What is your opinion about how a
kernel space SCSI target framework should fit in the Linux kernel ?

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/