linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 May 2008 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
To:	Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>
cc:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization

one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the 
family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could 
you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?

also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more 
than it helps anything.

thanks
-dean

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:

> * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
> 
> >Hi, Sebastian,
> Hi Huang,
> 
> sorry for the delay.
> 
> >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
> >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
> >is attached with the mail.
> The new results are attached.
> 
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Huang Ying
> 
> Sebastian
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/