lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 08:21:15 +0400 From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com> To: "Paul Jackson" <pj@....com> Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: x86-64defconfig remake On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote: > Cyrill wrote: > > The current x86_64_defconfig contains a number of nonexistent > > symbols. > > These symbols don't exist in what context? > > The one I notice: > > > -# CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set > > certainly exists, in init/Kconfig: > > config CPUSETS > bool "Cpuset support" > depends on SMP && CGROUPS > > and is enabled by default in some configs: > > arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig > arch/mips/configs/ip27_defconfig > arch/mips/configs/sb1250-swarm_defconfig > arch/powerpc/configs/cell_defconfig > arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig > arch/powerpc/configspseries_defconfig > > I could be tempted to enable cpusets by default in x86_64 > as well, however I don't understand the tradeoffs of such > a change well enough to know if I should propose that. > > -- > I won't rest till it's the best ... > Programmer, Linux Scalability > Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214 > Thanks Paul for feedback, will take a look today evening. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists